<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s with the name &#8220;Xinjiang&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.farwestchina.com/2010/05/whats-with-the-name-xinjiang.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.farwestchina.com/2010/05/whats-with-the-name-xinjiang.html</link>
	<description>Travel and Live in Xinjiang, China&#039;s Silk Road</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:23:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ma Si Wen</title>
		<link>http://www.farwestchina.com/2010/05/whats-with-the-name-xinjiang.html/comment-page-1#comment-124787</link>
		<dc:creator>Ma Si Wen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farwestchina.com/?p=1745#comment-124787</guid>
		<description>Check out this interesting article on how the Chinese cities are named. More to follow in this series.

http://mychinesenotebook.blogspot.com/2011/07/chinese-city-names-and-their-meanings.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this interesting article on how the Chinese cities are named. More to follow in this series.</p>
<p><a href="http://mychinesenotebook.blogspot.com/2011/07/chinese-city-names-and-their-meanings.html" rel="nofollow">http://mychinesenotebook.blogspot.com/2011/07/chinese-city-names-and-their-meanings.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.farwestchina.com/2010/05/whats-with-the-name-xinjiang.html/comment-page-1#comment-18267</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 06:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farwestchina.com/?p=1745#comment-18267</guid>
		<description>I thought Canada has an area called New Territory, and an island called Newfoundland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Canada has an area called New Territory, and an island called Newfoundland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: an lushan</title>
		<link>http://www.farwestchina.com/2010/05/whats-with-the-name-xinjiang.html/comment-page-1#comment-6541</link>
		<dc:creator>an lushan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 23:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farwestchina.com/?p=1745#comment-6541</guid>
		<description>lol uyghurs converted to islam by force. Your mad joyce, stark bonkers, probably a bible basher.

Islam entered central asia around the 7th century with a few bands of arabs, and gradually the turkic tribes became muslims , mainly through sufism. This was accelerated during the migration of turkic tribes from mongolia, and east turkistan in the face of mongol expansion. And eventually that islam spread back to the turkic tribes, who like the mongols are the early inhabitors of inner mongolia, mongolia, east turkistan (now xinjiang)

and no they are not part of the chinese mother land, they are a seperate people, a nomadic people with entirely non han, manchurian or whatever beleifs way of life.
China is what is south of the great chinese wall. Everything else was annexed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol uyghurs converted to islam by force. Your mad joyce, stark bonkers, probably a bible basher.</p>
<p>Islam entered central asia around the 7th century with a few bands of arabs, and gradually the turkic tribes became muslims , mainly through sufism. This was accelerated during the migration of turkic tribes from mongolia, and east turkistan in the face of mongol expansion. And eventually that islam spread back to the turkic tribes, who like the mongols are the early inhabitors of inner mongolia, mongolia, east turkistan (now xinjiang)</p>
<p>and no they are not part of the chinese mother land, they are a seperate people, a nomadic people with entirely non han, manchurian or whatever beleifs way of life.<br />
China is what is south of the great chinese wall. Everything else was annexed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KMT</title>
		<link>http://www.farwestchina.com/2010/05/whats-with-the-name-xinjiang.html/comment-page-1#comment-3520</link>
		<dc:creator>KMT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 02:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farwestchina.com/?p=1745#comment-3520</guid>
		<description>I agree with you Chinese Nationalist. Xinjiang was just a frontier before assimilation during the Qing. Xinjiang will become sinicized whether the Uyghurs like it or not. The heavy military presence Xinjiang insures that it will not break way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you Chinese Nationalist. Xinjiang was just a frontier before assimilation during the Qing. Xinjiang will become sinicized whether the Uyghurs like it or not. The heavy military presence Xinjiang insures that it will not break way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinese Nationalist</title>
		<link>http://www.farwestchina.com/2010/05/whats-with-the-name-xinjiang.html/comment-page-1#comment-2684</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinese Nationalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farwestchina.com/?p=1745#comment-2684</guid>
		<description>First of all, I think the &quot;Xinjiang has been inseparable part of China since Han dynasty&quot; argument is the most worthless and stupid crap a nation ever came up to prove its right over a land. You don&#039;t have to backtrack 2000 years to prove your sovereignty! Most of the nation states of the world formed during the past 300 years! 

In my mind, Xinjiang region was formally incorporated into contemporary China during Qing dynasty in 1700&#039;s. This region has been recognized by all other nations and international organizations as part of China since then. It doesn&#039;t matter if Uyghur people have been in Xinjiang for 1000 years or 1 million years. Xinjiang is part of China! 

You want to talk about assimilation? Let&#039;s do it. 10 million Uyghur among 1.3 billion Han speaking people and you go figure. That&#039;s the nature&#039;s law. Don&#039;t like it? Go find a universe where a drop of ink won&#039;t dissipate in a cup of water and live in it!   Just remember, Chinese people have the right to move around in China! CCP needs to stop limiting people’s right to move around!

Chinese communist government is bad? Please shake hands with me. These guys need to give power back to the people. But why does it have anything to do with China&#039;s sovereignty over Xinjiang? When does bad behavior of a government determine the boundary of a nation? I don&#039;t remember segregated United States got broken into pieces. 

All in all, if you don&#039;t like living in China, get the $*&amp;@ out of here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I think the &#8220;Xinjiang has been inseparable part of China since Han dynasty&#8221; argument is the most worthless and stupid crap a nation ever came up to prove its right over a land. You don&#8217;t have to backtrack 2000 years to prove your sovereignty! Most of the nation states of the world formed during the past 300 years! </p>
<p>In my mind, Xinjiang region was formally incorporated into contemporary China during Qing dynasty in 1700&#8242;s. This region has been recognized by all other nations and international organizations as part of China since then. It doesn&#8217;t matter if Uyghur people have been in Xinjiang for 1000 years or 1 million years. Xinjiang is part of China! </p>
<p>You want to talk about assimilation? Let&#8217;s do it. 10 million Uyghur among 1.3 billion Han speaking people and you go figure. That&#8217;s the nature&#8217;s law. Don&#8217;t like it? Go find a universe where a drop of ink won&#8217;t dissipate in a cup of water and live in it!   Just remember, Chinese people have the right to move around in China! CCP needs to stop limiting people’s right to move around!</p>
<p>Chinese communist government is bad? Please shake hands with me. These guys need to give power back to the people. But why does it have anything to do with China&#8217;s sovereignty over Xinjiang? When does bad behavior of a government determine the boundary of a nation? I don&#8217;t remember segregated United States got broken into pieces. </p>
<p>All in all, if you don&#8217;t like living in China, get the $*&#038;@ out of here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.farwestchina.com/2010/05/whats-with-the-name-xinjiang.html/comment-page-1#comment-2057</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farwestchina.com/?p=1745#comment-2057</guid>
		<description>Joyce, Commies gave Tibetan scrip to them? haha! It&#039;s a joke right? You have no idea.

Tibetan script was mastered by Thummi Samboda of the mid 7tgh century, a minister of Songsten Gampo ( 569-649). He was sent along with other ministers, many of whom died because of Indian heat. They were sent to India to study the art of writing and upon his return introduced the Tibetan script. India at the time was under Gupta Dynasty. You will see the resemblance between the two scripts if you studied it.

So, if you don&#039;t know - don&#039;t spread false information. This isn&#039;t a propaganda board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joyce, Commies gave Tibetan scrip to them? haha! It&#8217;s a joke right? You have no idea.</p>
<p>Tibetan script was mastered by Thummi Samboda of the mid 7tgh century, a minister of Songsten Gampo ( 569-649). He was sent along with other ministers, many of whom died because of Indian heat. They were sent to India to study the art of writing and upon his return introduced the Tibetan script. India at the time was under Gupta Dynasty. You will see the resemblance between the two scripts if you studied it.</p>
<p>So, if you don&#8217;t know &#8211; don&#8217;t spread false information. This isn&#8217;t a propaganda board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.farwestchina.com/2010/05/whats-with-the-name-xinjiang.html/comment-page-1#comment-2056</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farwestchina.com/?p=1745#comment-2056</guid>
		<description>Just because China restricts any negative information especially in regards to it&#039;s human right violation in the Uighur and Tibetans doesn&#039;t mean it has a liberal ethnicity policies.

At least America has free media and we are free to make our own judgment. Try living in China and criticize it&#039;s policy, I will watch how long you last.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because China restricts any negative information especially in regards to it&#8217;s human right violation in the Uighur and Tibetans doesn&#8217;t mean it has a liberal ethnicity policies.</p>
<p>At least America has free media and we are free to make our own judgment. Try living in China and criticize it&#8217;s policy, I will watch how long you last.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kahraman</title>
		<link>http://www.farwestchina.com/2010/05/whats-with-the-name-xinjiang.html/comment-page-1#comment-1770</link>
		<dc:creator>kahraman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 18:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farwestchina.com/?p=1745#comment-1770</guid>
		<description>You were being facetious about Genghis Khan, right ?  I am actually reading Empire of the Steppes right now.

Impressive historical overview on your part.  It is much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were being facetious about Genghis Khan, right ?  I am actually reading Empire of the Steppes right now.</p>
<p>Impressive historical overview on your part.  It is much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tez</title>
		<link>http://www.farwestchina.com/2010/05/whats-with-the-name-xinjiang.html/comment-page-1#comment-1593</link>
		<dc:creator>tez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 13:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farwestchina.com/?p=1745#comment-1593</guid>
		<description>&quot;I don’t know much about Uyghur personally&quot; You make a lot of comments about them then Joyce for some one who doesn&#039;t know much about them, wouldn&#039;t you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don’t know much about Uyghur personally&#8221; You make a lot of comments about them then Joyce for some one who doesn&#8217;t know much about them, wouldn&#8217;t you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tez</title>
		<link>http://www.farwestchina.com/2010/05/whats-with-the-name-xinjiang.html/comment-page-1#comment-1589</link>
		<dc:creator>tez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 09:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.farwestchina.com/?p=1745#comment-1589</guid>
		<description>I correct what i wrote above:

&quot;To say Uighur werent around at the time is true but their descendants were..&quot;

should read &quot;their ancestors were&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I correct what i wrote above:</p>
<p>&#8220;To say Uighur werent around at the time is true but their descendants were..&#8221;</p>
<p>should read &#8220;their ancestors were&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

